DGCR6

Chr 22

DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 6

DiGeorge syndrome, and more widely, the CATCH 22 syndrome, are associated with microdeletions in chromosomal region 22q11.2. The product of this gene shares homology with the Drosophila melanogaster gonadal protein, which participates in gonadal and germ cell development, and with the gamma-1 subunit of human laminin. This gene is a candidate for involvement in DiGeorge syndrome pathology and in schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

GeneReviewsOMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.83
Clinical SummaryDGCR6
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
2 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 50 VUS of 65 total submissions
📖
GeneReview available — DGCR6
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.83LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.88
OE 1.28 (0.851.83)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
-0.14Z-score
OE missense 1.03 (0.901.20)
130 obs / 125.7 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?1.28 (0.851.83)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.03 (0.901.20)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.13
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 15 / 11.8Missense obs/exp: 130 / 125.7Syn Z: -0.74

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6161th %ile
GOF
0.74top 25%
LOF
0.3745th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

65 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS50
Likely Benign5
Benign2
1
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
50
VUS
5
Likely Benign
2
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
VUS
0
48
2
0
50
Likely Benign
0
2
0
3
5
Benign
0
0
1
1
2
Total0505459

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

307 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 341) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap DGCR6 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

DGCR6 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →