DCAF17

Chr 2AR

DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 17

Also known as: C20orf37, C2orf37

This gene encodes a nuclear transmembrane protein that associates with cullin 4A/damaged DNA binding protein 1 ubiquitin ligase complex. Mutations in this gene are associated with Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

Woodhouse-Sakati syndromeMIM #241080
AR
508
ClinVar variants
73
Pathogenic / LP
0.00
pLI score
0
Active trials
Clinical SummaryDCAF17
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome · ARDefinitive

Definitive — sufficient evidence for diagnostic panels

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
73 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 127 VUS of 508 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.82LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.30
OE 0.53 (0.350.82)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.82Z-score
OE missense 0.86 (0.770.96)
230 obs / 267.5 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.53 (0.350.82)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.86 (0.770.96)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.93
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 15 / 28.2Missense obs/exp: 230 / 267.5Syn Z: 0.56

ClinVar Variant Classifications

508 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic54
Likely Pathogenic19
VUS127
Likely Benign234
Benign55
Conflicting19
54
Pathogenic
19
Likely Pathogenic
127
VUS
234
Likely Benign
55
Benign
19
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
21
2
31
0
54
Likely Pathogenic
16
1
2
0
19
VUS
1
67
59
0
127
Likely Benign
0
2
130
102
234
Benign
0
0
52
3
55
Conflicting
19
Total3872274105508

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

DCAF17 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Gene2Phenotype Curations

DCAF17-related Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome

limited
ARLoss Of FunctionAbsent Gene Product
Dev. Disorders
G2P ↗

Gene2Phenotype curations · DECIPHER consortium patient cohort (public variants) · deciphergenomics.org

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype Relationships

1 OMIM entry

Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome

MIM #241080

Molecular basis of disorder known

Autosomal recessive
📖
GeneReview available — DCAF17
Authoritative clinical overview · NCBI Bookshelf · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
Woodhouse-Sakati syndrome: A review.
Messina C·Rev Neurol (Paris)
2025Review
Top 10 resultsSearch PubMed ↗
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →