CTR9

Chr 11

CTR9 component of Paf1/RNA polymerase II complex

Also known as: SH2BP1, TSBP, p150, p150TSP

The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the PAF1 complex, which associates with RNA polymerase II and functions in transcriptional regulation and elongation. This complex also plays a role in the modification of histones. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2016]

569
ClinVar variants
25
Pathogenic / LP
1.00
pLI score· haploinsufficient
0
Active trials
Clinical SummaryCTR9
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
CTR9-related neurodevelopmental disorder · ADModerate

Moderate evidence — consider for supplementary testing

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Highly constrained gene — heterozygous loss-of-function variants are very rare in the population (pLI 1.00). One damaged copy is likely sufficient to cause disease.
📋
ClinVar Variants
25 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 287 VUS of 569 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Dual constrained — LoF & missense intolerant
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.14LOEUF
pLI 1.000
Z-score 7.18
OE 0.06 (0.030.14)
Highly constrained

Among the most LoF-intolerant genes (~top 3%)

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
4.30Z-score
OE missense 0.52 (0.480.57)
337 obs / 644.2 exp
Constrained

Highly missense-constrained (top ~0.1%)

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.06 (0.030.14)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.52 (0.480.57)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.04
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 4 / 67.8Missense obs/exp: 337 / 644.2Syn Z: -0.45

ClinVar Variant Classifications

569 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic11
Likely Pathogenic14
VUS287
Likely Benign207
Benign43
Conflicting7
11
Pathogenic
14
Likely Pathogenic
287
VUS
207
Likely Benign
43
Benign
7
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
1
0
10
0
11
Likely Pathogenic
0
14
0
0
14
VUS
8
250
26
3
287
Likely Benign
0
7
97
103
207
Benign
0
3
34
6
43
Conflicting
7
Total9274167112569

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CTR9 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Gene2Phenotype Curations

CTR9-related neurodevelopmental disorder

moderate
ADDominant NegativeAltered Gene Product Structure
Dev. Disorders
G2P ↗
missense variant

CTR9-related Wilms tumour

moderate
ADLoss Of FunctionAbsent Gene Product, Altered Gene Product Structure
Cancer
G2P ↗

Gene2Phenotype curations · DECIPHER consortium patient cohort (public variants) · deciphergenomics.org

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype Relationships

1 OMIM entry

📖
GeneReview available — CTR9
Authoritative clinical overview · NCBI Bookshelf · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →