CRYM

Chr 16AD

crystallin mu

Also known as: DFNA40, THBP

Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific and ubiquitous. The former class is also called phylogenetically-restricted crystallins. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. This gene encodes a taxon-specific crystallin protein that binds NADPH and has sequence similarity to bacterial ornithine cyclodeaminases. The encoded protein does not perform a structural role in lens tissue, and instead it binds thyroid hormone for possible regulatory or developmental roles. Mutations in this gene have been associated with autosomal dominant non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2014]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismADLOEUF 0.761 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryCRYM
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss · ADLimited

Limited evidence — not for standalone diagnostic reporting

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.03) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
63 VUS of 149 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.76LOEUF
pLI 0.026
Z-score 2.21
OE 0.36 (0.190.76)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.98Z-score
OE missense 0.79 (0.690.91)
138 obs / 174.6 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.36 (0.190.76)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.79 (0.690.91)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.86
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 13.9Missense obs/exp: 138 / 174.6Syn Z: 0.89

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6744th %ile
GOF
0.7126th %ile
LOF
0.2777th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

149 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS63
Likely Benign43
Benign28
Conflicting11
63
VUS
43
Likely Benign
28
Benign
11
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
5
51
7
0
63
Likely Benign
0
3
21
19
43
Benign
0
0
26
2
28
Conflicting
11
Total5545421145

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

14 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 21) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap CRYM — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CRYM · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →