CRYGA

Chr 2

crystallin gamma A

Also known as: CRY-g-A, CRYG1, CRYG5

Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Gamma-crystallins are a homogeneous group of highly symmetrical, monomeric proteins typically lacking connecting peptides and terminal extensions. They are differentially regulated after early development. Four gamma-crystallin genes (gamma-A through gamma-D) and three pseudogenes (gamma-E, gamma-F, gamma-G) are tandemly organized in a genomic segment as a gene cluster. Whether due to aging or mutations in specific genes, gamma-crystallins have been involved in cataract formation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
DNmechanismLOEUF 1.82
Clinical SummaryCRYGA
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
41 VUS of 49 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.82LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.68
OE 1.22 (0.791.82)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
-0.65Z-score
OE missense 1.17 (1.021.35)
136 obs / 116.3 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?1.22 (0.791.82)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.17 (1.021.35)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.06
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 13 / 10.6Missense obs/exp: 136 / 116.3Syn Z: -0.33

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7325th %ile
GOF
0.3887th %ile
LOF
0.4726th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

49 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS41
Likely Benign4
Benign3
Conflicting1
41
VUS
4
Likely Benign
3
Benign
1
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
41
0
0
41
Likely Benign
0
3
0
1
4
Benign
1
1
0
1
3
Conflicting
1
Total1450249

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

27 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 34) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap CRYGA — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CRYGA · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →