CLDN24

Chr 4

claudin 24

Also known as: CLDN21

This gene encodes a member of the claudin family. Claudins are integral membrane proteins and components of tight junction strands. Tight junction strands serve as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space between epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, and also play critical roles in maintaining cell polarity and signal transductions. The protein encoded by this gene is 75% identical to the mouse homolog. This gene is upstream of the CLDN22 gene, which overlaps the WWC2 gene on the opposite strand in the genome.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.85
Clinical SummaryCLDN24
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
26 VUS of 29 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.85LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.43
OE 1.18 (0.681.85)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.45Z-score
OE missense 0.88 (0.751.04)
98 obs / 111.4 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?1.18 (0.681.85)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.88 (0.751.04)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.07
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 8 / 6.8Missense obs/exp: 98 / 111.4Syn Z: -0.40

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6259th %ile
GOF
0.80top 10%
LOF
0.2680th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

29 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS26
Likely Benign3
26
VUS
3
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
26
0
0
26
Likely Benign
0
3
0
0
3
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total0290029

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

102 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 109) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap CLDN24 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CLDN24 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →