CD200R1

Chr 3

CD200 receptor 1

Also known as: CD200R, HCRTR2, MOX2R, OX2R

This gene encodes a receptor for the OX-2 membrane glycoprotein. Both the receptor and substrate are cell surface glycoproteins containing two immunoglobulin-like domains. This receptor is restricted to the surfaces of myeloid lineage cells and the receptor-substrate interaction may function as a myeloid downregulatory signal. Mouse studies of a related gene suggest that this interaction may control myeloid function in a tissue-specific manner. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.37
Clinical SummaryCD200R1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
44 VUS of 57 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.37LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.47
OE 0.87 (0.581.37)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.70Z-score
OE missense 0.85 (0.750.97)
157 obs / 183.8 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.87 (0.581.37)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.85 (0.750.97)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.98
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 14 / 16.0Missense obs/exp: 157 / 183.8Syn Z: 0.11

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7131th %ile
GOF
0.77top 25%
LOF
0.2775th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

57 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS44
Likely Benign4
Benign3
44
VUS
4
Likely Benign
3
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
44
0
0
44
Likely Benign
0
4
0
0
4
Benign
0
2
1
0
3
Total0501051

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

28 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 32) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap CD200R1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CD200R1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →