CCR3

Chr 3

C-C motif chemokine receptor 3

Also known as: C C CKR3, CC-CKR-3, CD193, CKR 3, CKR3, CMKBR3

The CCR3 protein is a G protein-coupled receptor that regulates migration and activation of eosinophils and other immune cells in response to chemokines including eotaxin. Mutations cause autosomal recessive severe congenital neutropenia with eosinophilia. This gene is highly tolerant to loss-of-function mutations in the general population, suggesting the pathogenic variants may have specific effects on protein function.

GeneReviewsOMIMResearchSummary from RefSeq, UniProt
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.36
Clinical SummaryCCR3
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
8 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 54 VUS of 72 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
4 active or recruiting trials — potential therapeutic options may be available
📖
GeneReview available — CCR3
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint
1.36LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.78
OE 0.73 (0.411.36)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint
0.10Z-score
OE missense 0.98 (0.881.10)
205 obs / 208.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios
LoF OE0.73 (0.411.36)
00.351.4
Missense OE0.98 (0.881.10)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE1.11
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 7 / 9.6Missense obs/exp: 205 / 208.9Syn Z: -0.81
DN
0.82top 10%
GOF
0.80top 10%
LOF
0.1697th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

72 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic7
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS54
Likely Benign8
7
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
54
VUS
8
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
7
0
7
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
VUS
0
53
1
0
54
Likely Benign
0
4
2
2
8
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total05711270

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CCR3 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

3D Protein StructureAlphaFold
Clinical Literature
Open Research Assistant →