CCDC182

Chr 17

coiled-coil domain containing 182

Predicted to be involved in female gonad development. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

0
Active trials
5
Pathogenic / LP
5
ClinVar variants
2
Pubs (1 yr)
0.8
Missense Z
0.75
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryCCDC182
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Moderately constrained gene (pLI 0.70) — some intolerance to loss-of-function variants.
📋
ClinVar Variants
5 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic of 5 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.75LOEUF
pLI 0.701
Z-score 1.84
OE 0.00 (0.000.75)
Moderately constrained

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.81Z-score
OE missense 0.77 (0.640.93)
74 obs / 96.5 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.00 (0.000.75)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.77 (0.640.93)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.58
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 0 / 4.0Missense obs/exp: 74 / 96.5Syn Z: 2.12
DN
0.5673th %ile
GOF
0.6834th %ile
LOF
0.4529th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is gain-of-function.

GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

5 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic5
5
Pathogenic

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories· variant type breakdown unavailable

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
5
Likely Pathogenic
0
VUS
0
Likely Benign
0
Benign
0
Total5

Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

CCDC182 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC

No open access results found