ARHGEF15

Chr 17AD

Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 15

Also known as: ARGEF15, BSVD5, E5, Ephexin5, Vsm-RhoGEF

Rho GTPases play a fundamental role in numerous cellular processes that are initiated by extracellular stimuli that work through G protein-coupled receptors. This gene encodes a protein that functions as a specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RhoA. It also interacts with ephrin A4 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Two alternatively spliced transcripts variants that encode the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismADLOEUF 0.671 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryARHGEF15
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
4 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 439 VUS of 721 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.67LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 3.15
OE 0.44 (0.300.67)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.71Z-score
OE missense 0.91 (0.840.98)
475 obs / 520.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.44 (0.300.67)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.91 (0.840.98)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.91
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 16 / 36.5Missense obs/exp: 475 / 520.9Syn Z: 1.04

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6261th %ile
GOF
0.72top 25%
LOF
0.3647th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

721 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic3
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS439
Likely Benign230
Benign32
Conflicting13
3
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
439
VUS
230
Likely Benign
32
Benign
13
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
3
0
3
Likely Pathogenic
0
1
0
0
1
VUS
25
389
23
2
439
Likely Benign
0
11
78
141
230
Benign
0
9
8
15
32
Conflicting
13
Total25410112158718

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

16 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 30) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap ARHGEF15 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ARHGEF15 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →