ANKRD30A

Chr 10

ankyrin repeat domain 30A

Also known as: NY-BR-1

This gene encodes a DNA-binding transcription factor that is uniquely expressed in mammary epithelium and testis. The gene shows very low constraint against loss-of-function variants (pLI near zero), and no pediatric neurological disorders have been definitively associated with ANKRD30A mutations to date. Current evidence suggests this gene may be primarily relevant to breast cancer rather than neurogenetic conditions.

Summary from RefSeq
Research Assistant →
0
Active trials
2
Pubs (1 yr)
8
P/LP submissions
0%
P/LP missense
1.26
LOEUF
Multiple*
Mechanism· predicted
Clinical SummaryANKRD30A
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
8 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 170 VUS of 212 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

pubtator: Error: PubTator3 HTTP 502

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint
1.26LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.23
OE 1.03 (0.851.26)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint
-2.83Z-score
OE missense 1.33 (1.251.41)
778 obs / 585.6 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios
LoF OE1.03 (0.851.26)
00.351.4
Missense OE1.33 (1.251.41)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE1.20
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 67 / 65.0Missense obs/exp: 778 / 585.6Syn Z: -2.27
DN
0.75top 25%
GOF
0.78top 25%
LOF
0.3067th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

212 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic7
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS170
Likely Benign19
Benign3
7
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
170
VUS
19
Likely Benign
3
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
7
0
7
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
VUS
1
165
4
0
170
Likely Benign
0
15
2
2
19
Benign
0
1
2
0
3
Total1181162200

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ANKRD30A · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Open Research Assistant →
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC

No open access results found