ANKFN1

Chr 17

ankyrin repeat and fibronectin type III domain containing 1

Also known as: WAKE

Predicted to be involved in establishment of mitotic spindle orientation and regulation of establishment of bipolar cell polarity. Predicted to act upstream of or within behavioral fear response; equilibrioception; and locomotor rhythm. Predicted to be active in spindle. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

0
Active trials
11
Pathogenic / LP
110
ClinVar variants
0
Pubs (1 yr)
0.6
Missense Z
0.75
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryANKFN1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
11 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 97 VUS of 110 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.75LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.87
OE 0.53 (0.380.75)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.56Z-score
OE missense 0.92 (0.851.00)
383 obs / 415.0 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.53 (0.380.75)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.92 (0.851.00)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.98
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 23 / 43.4Missense obs/exp: 383 / 415.0Syn Z: 0.20
DN
0.6356th %ile
GOF
0.6247th %ile
LOF
0.4627th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

110 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic11
VUS97
Likely Benign2
11
Pathogenic
97
VUS
2
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
11
0
11
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
95
2
0
97
Likely Benign
0
2
0
0
2
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total097130110

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ANKFN1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC