ACADL

Chr 2

acyl-CoA dehydrogenase long chain

Also known as: ACAD4, LCAD

The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, which is a family of mitochondrial flavoenzymes involved in fatty acid and branched chain amino-acid metabolism. This protein is one of the four enzymes that catalyze the initial step of mitochondrial beta-oxidation of straight-chain fatty acid. Defects in this gene are the cause of long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCAD) deficiency, leading to nonketotic hypoglycemia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.16
Clinical SummaryACADL
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency · ARDisputed

Disputed — evidence questions this relationship

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
65 VUS of 94 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.16LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.91
OE 0.81 (0.571.16)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.86Z-score
OE missense 0.84 (0.750.95)
196 obs / 232.7 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.81 (0.571.16)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.84 (0.750.95)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.75
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 21 / 26.0Missense obs/exp: 196 / 232.7Syn Z: 1.79

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7327th %ile
GOF
0.6932th %ile
LOF
0.3260th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

94 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS65
Likely Benign15
Benign6
Conflicting3
65
VUS
15
Likely Benign
6
Benign
3
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
3
61
1
0
65
Likely Benign
1
3
4
7
15
Benign
0
2
2
2
6
Conflicting
3
Total4667989

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

23 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 29) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap ACADL — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ACADL · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →