ABCC3

Chr 17

ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 3

Also known as: ABC31, EST90757, MLP2, MOAT-D, MRP3, cMOAT2

The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. The specific function of this protein has not yet been determined; however, this protein may play a role in the transport of biliary and intestinal excretion of organic anions. Alternatively spliced variants which encode different protein isoforms have been described; however, not all variants have been fully characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

1
Active trials
223
ClinVar variants
11
Pathogenic / LP
0.6
Missense Z
0.90
LOEUF
9
Pubs (2 yr)
Clinical SummaryABCC3
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
11 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 177 VUS of 223 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available
📖
GeneReview available — ABCC3
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗
Some data sources returned errors (1)

ensembl: Error: Ensembl fetch failed: 500 for https://rest.ensembl.org/lookup/symbol/homo_sapiens/ABCC3?content-type=application/json&expand=1

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.90LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.29
OE 0.71 (0.570.90)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.63Z-score
OE missense 0.94 (0.891.00)
848 obs / 901.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.71 (0.570.90)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.94 (0.891.00)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.90
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 52 / 73.1Missense obs/exp: 848 / 901.2Syn Z: 1.59

ClinVar Variant Classifications

223 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic10
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS177
Likely Benign30
Benign5
10
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
177
VUS
30
Likely Benign
5
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
10
0
10
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
VUS
0
177
0
0
177
Likely Benign
0
19
1
10
30
Benign
0
3
1
1
5
Total01991311223

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ABCC3 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype Relationships

1 OMIM entry

Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
Genetics of perioperative pain management.
Packiasabapathy S et al.·Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
2018Review
Top 10 resultsSearch PubMed ↗