LUC7L

Chr 16

LUC7 like

Also known as: LUC7B1, Luc7, SR+89, hLuc7B1

The LUC7L gene may represent a mammalian heterochromatic gene, encoding a putative RNA-binding protein similar to the yeast Luc7p subunit of the U1 snRNP splicing complex that is normally required for 5-prime splice site selection (Tufarelli et al., 2001 [PubMed 11170747]).[supplied by OMIM, Mar 2008]

0
Active trials
47
Pathogenic / LP
126
ClinVar variants
1
Pubs (1 yr)
1.9
Missense Z
0.45
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryLUC7L
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.21) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
47 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 75 VUS of 126 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.45LOEUF
pLI 0.470
Z-score 3.51
OE 0.21 (0.110.45)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
1.88Z-score
OE missense 0.66 (0.580.76)
165 obs / 248.4 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.21 (0.110.45)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.66 (0.580.76)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.99
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 23.3Missense obs/exp: 165 / 248.4Syn Z: 0.06
DN
0.6937th %ile
GOF
0.6150th %ile
LOF
0.4627th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

126 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic47
VUS75
Likely Benign3
Benign1
47
Pathogenic
75
VUS
3
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
47
0
47
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
53
22
0
75
Likely Benign
0
1
0
2
3
Benign
0
1
0
0
1
Total055692126

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

LUC7L · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
Top 1 results · since 2015Search PubMed ↗